CMClearMathAcademy

Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint

A free Logic lesson from the “Logical Equivalence” unit, with a worked example and practice problems including step-by-step solutions.

This checkpoint checks whether learners can preserve meaning while rewriting statements. Learning objective: Review equivalence, De Morgan's Laws, contrapositives, and truth-table tests. Prerequisite: Review the lessons in this unit before starting.. Work in this lesson starts with ordinary language, then connects the idea to symbols only after the meaning is clear. Example 1: A truth-table question asks for cases; a counterexample question asks for one case that breaks a claim. Example 2: A validity question asks whether the conclusion must follow, not whether the sentences sound realistic. A common misconception is to treat familiar wording as proof; instead, check exactly what the statement says and what follows from it.

What you'll learn

Why it matters: Mixed review builds the habit of choosing the right reasoning tool for the claim in front of you.

Worked example

Problem. Example case A (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): Which statement is equivalent to ¬(p ∧ q)?

  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Example case A (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): Which statement is equivalent to ¬(p ∧ q)?
  2. Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
  3. Use De Morgan's Law.
  4. Negating an and changes it to or.

Answer: ¬p ∨ ¬q

Practice problems

1. Practice case A (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): Which statement is equivalent to ¬(p ∧ q)?

Choices: ¬p ∨ ¬q · ¬p ∧ ¬q · p ∨ q · p ∧ ¬q

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case A (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): Which statement is equivalent to ¬(p ∧ q)?
  2. Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
  3. Use De Morgan's Law.
  4. Negating an and changes it to or.
  5. Negate both parts: ¬p ∨ ¬q.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: ¬p ∨ ¬q

2. Practice case B (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): A truth table with two variables has how many rows?

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case B (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): A truth table with two variables has how many rows?
  2. Choose the operation or relationship that matches the wording, then carry it out one clear step at a time.
  3. Each variable has two truth values.
  4. Two variables create 2 x 2 cases.
  5. That gives 4 rows.
  6. Check the result by substituting or estimating: the response should match 4 and make sense in the original problem.

Answer: 4

3. Practice case C (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): What is the converse of "If a student scores at least 70, then the quiz is passed"?

Choices: If the quiz is passed, then a student scores at least 70. · If not a student scores at least 70, then not the quiz is passed. · If not the quiz is passed, then not a student scores at least 70. · a student scores at least 70 and the quiz is passed.

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case C (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): What is the converse of "If a student scores at least 70, then the quiz is passed"?
  2. Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
  3. The converse switches the hypothesis and conclusion.
  4. It does not negate them.
  5. So q -> p is the converse.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: If the quiz is passed, then a student scores at least 70.

4. Practice case D (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): How can a truth table show two statements are equivalent?

Choices: Their final columns match in every row. · They use the same number of letters. · One statement is longer. · Both contain an arrow.

Show solution
  1. Equivalence means same truth value in every case.
  2. Truth tables list every case.
  3. Matching final columns prove equivalence.

Answer: Their final columns match in every row.

5. Practice case E (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): In the row p=False, q=True, r=True, what is p ↔ q?

Choices: True · False

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case E (Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint): In the row p=False, q=True, r=True, what is p ↔ q?
  2. Use inverse operations to isolate the unknown, and keep both sides balanced at every step.
  3. p is False and q is True.
  4. A biconditional is true when both parts have the same truth value.
  5. The final value is False.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: False

Practice this interactively with instant feedback and an AI tutor.

Practice Unit 7 Review and Checkpoint Take the free placement check

More Logic lessons