Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions
A free Logic lesson from the “Biconditionals and Definitions” unit, with a worked example and practice problems including step-by-step solutions.
Definitions should classify examples correctly. A bad definition may include things it should exclude, exclude things it should include, or use the term it is trying to define. Learning objective: Identify definitions that are too broad, too narrow, or circular. Prerequisite: No formal prerequisite. Work in this lesson starts with ordinary language, then connects the idea to symbols only after the meaning is clear. Example 1: 'x is even iff x is divisible by 2' works in both directions. Example 2: A definition that only works one way is too broad or too narrow. A common misconception is to treat familiar wording as proof; instead, check exactly what the statement says and what follows from it.
What you'll learn
- Identify definitions that are too broad, too narrow, or circular
- Explain the idea in plain English before using symbols
- Use examples, non-examples, or counterexamples to check the reasoning
Worked example
Problem. Example case A (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): What does p ↔ q mean?
- Worked Example: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Example case A (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): What does p ↔ q mean?
- For data questions, identify what each statistic measures before calculating so the result matches the question.
- A biconditional is two-way.
- It contains both conditional directions.
Answer: p implies q and q implies p
Practice problems
1. Practice case A (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): What does p ↔ q mean?
Choices: p implies q and q implies p · p implies q only · p and q are both false · not p or q
Show solution
- Warm-up: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case A (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): What does p ↔ q mean?
- For data questions, identify what each statistic measures before calculating so the result matches the question.
- A biconditional is two-way.
- It contains both conditional directions.
- So p ↔ q means each statement implies the other.
- Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.
Answer: p implies q and q implies p
2. Practice case B (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): Which definition works as a biconditional?
Choices: A number is even iff it is divisible by 2. · A number is even iff it is positive. · A rectangle is a square iff it has four sides. · A prime number is any odd number.
Show solution
- A good definition works both ways.
- Even numbers are exactly the integers divisible by 2.
- The other definitions are too broad or false.
Answer: A number is even iff it is divisible by 2.
3. Practice case C (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): A definition is too broad when it:
Choices: includes things that should be excluded · excludes correct examples · uses symbols · has examples
Show solution
- Too broad means the category catches extra objects.
- For example, defining square as any four-sided figure includes rectangles that are not squares.
- So it includes too much.
Answer: includes things that should be excluded
4. Practice case D (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): A definition is too narrow when it:
Choices: excludes things that should be included · includes every possible object · uses if and only if · has a non-example
Show solution
- Too narrow means real examples are left out.
- A good definition includes all and only the intended objects.
- So the first choice is correct.
Answer: excludes things that should be included
5. Practice case E (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): Which object is a non-example for "a square is a rectangle with four equal sides"?
Choices: A 3 by 5 rectangle · A 4 by 4 square · A square tile · A rectangle with all sides equal
Show solution
- Core Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case E (Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions): Which object is a non-example for "a square is a rectangle with four equal sides"?
- Use the relevant geometric relationship first, then set up an equation from the angle measures or side relationships.
- A non-example should fail the definition.
- A 3 by 5 rectangle does not have four equal sides.
- So it is not a square.
- Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.
Answer: A 3 by 5 rectangle
Practice this interactively with instant feedback and an AI tutor.
Practice Good Definitions vs. Bad Definitions Take the free placement check