CMClearMathAcademy

Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint

A free Logic lesson from the “Quantifiers and Predicates” unit, with a worked example and practice problems including step-by-step solutions.

This checkpoint checks whether learners can reason with all and some without overclaiming. Learning objective: Review predicates, domains, all/some claims, and quantified negation. Prerequisite: Review the lessons in this unit before starting.. Work in this lesson starts with ordinary language, then connects the idea to symbols only after the meaning is clear. Example 1: A truth-table question asks for cases; a counterexample question asks for one case that breaks a claim. Example 2: A validity question asks whether the conclusion must follow, not whether the sentences sound realistic. A common misconception is to treat familiar wording as proof; instead, check exactly what the statement says and what follows from it.

What you'll learn

Why it matters: Mixed review builds the habit of choosing the right reasoning tool for the claim in front of you.

Worked example

Problem. Example case A (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): Which phrase signals a universal statement?

  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Example case A (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): Which phrase signals a universal statement?
  2. Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
  3. Universal statements talk about every object in the domain.
  4. The word all signals that.

Answer: all

Practice problems

1. Practice case A (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): Which phrase signals a universal statement?

Choices: all · some · at least one · there exists

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case A (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): Which phrase signals a universal statement?
  2. Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
  3. Universal statements talk about every object in the domain.
  4. The word all signals that.
  5. Some and exists are existential.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: all

2. Practice case B (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): Which mistake is common when negating "All dogs bark"?

Choices: Writing 'No dogs bark' instead of 'At least one dog does not bark' · Changing all to every · Keeping the same topic · Looking for a counterexample

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case B (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): Which mistake is common when negating "All dogs bark"?
  2. Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
  3. The opposite of all is not none.
  4. To make all false, one counterexample is enough.
  5. No dogs bark is stronger than needed.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: Writing 'No dogs bark' instead of 'At least one dog does not bark'

3. Practice case C (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): "Some A are B" means:

Choices: At least one object is in both A and B · Every A is B · No A is B · Every B is A

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case C (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): "Some A are B" means:
  2. For data questions, identify what each statistic measures before calculating so the result matches the question.
  3. Some means at least one.
  4. For set diagrams, that object lies in the overlap.
  5. It does not mean all.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: At least one object is in both A and B

4. Practice case D (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): What is the negation of "Some triangles are equilateral"?

Choices: No triangles are equilateral. · All triangles are equilateral. · Some triangles are not equilateral. · At least one triangle is equilateral.

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case D (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): What is the negation of "Some triangles are equilateral"?
  2. Use the relevant geometric relationship first, then set up an equation from the angle measures or side relationships.
  3. Some means at least one.
  4. The exact opposite is that none exist.
  5. So no triangles are equilateral.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: No triangles are equilateral.

5. Practice case E (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): The sentence "It is not false that p" is equivalent to:

Choices: p · ¬p · p ∧ ¬p · unknown

Show solution
  1. Checkpoint Practice: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case E (Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint): The sentence "It is not false that p" is equivalent to:
  2. Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
  3. Not false means true in two-valued logic.
  4. The double negative cancels.
  5. So the statement is equivalent to p.
  6. Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.

Answer: p

Practice this interactively with instant feedback and an AI tutor.

Practice Unit 9 Review and Checkpoint Take the free placement check

More Logic lessons