Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete
A free Logic lesson from the “Proof Readiness” unit, with a worked example and practice problems including step-by-step solutions.
A complete explanation gives enough reasons that a careful reader can follow every move. Missing reasons are not just style problems; they can hide logic gaps. Learning objective: Critique explanations for missing reasons or unsupported jumps. Prerequisite: No formal prerequisite. Work in this lesson starts with ordinary language, then connects the idea to symbols only after the meaning is clear. Example 1: A direct explanation starts with definitions and moves forward to the conclusion. Example 2: A counterexample must satisfy the setup and break the conclusion. A common misconception is to treat familiar wording as proof; instead, check exactly what the statement says and what follows from it.
What you'll learn
- Critique explanations for missing reasons or unsupported jumps
- Explain the idea in plain English before using symbols
- Use examples, non-examples, or counterexamples to check the reasoning
Worked example
Problem. Example case A (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): Which explanation is most complete?
- Worked Example: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Example case A (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): Which explanation is most complete?
- Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
- A complete explanation uses a definition.
- It shows the algebraic step.
Answer: Because x is even, x = 2k for an integer k, so x + 2 = 2(k + 1), which is even.
Practice problems
1. Practice case A (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): Which explanation is most complete?
Choices: Because x is even, x = 2k for an integer k, so x + 2 = 2(k + 1), which is even. · It stays even. · I tried x = 4. · The answer looks right.
Show solution
- Warm-up: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case A (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): Which explanation is most complete?
- Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
- A complete explanation uses a definition.
- It shows the algebraic step.
- It connects the result back to evenness.
- Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.
Answer: Because x is even, x = 2k for an integer k, so x + 2 = 2(k + 1), which is even.
2. Practice case B (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): Direct reasoning usually starts with:
Choices: the given information and definitions · the opposite of the conclusion · a random answer choice · a diagram with no labels
Show solution
- Warm-up: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case B (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): Direct reasoning usually starts with:
- Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
- Direct reasoning moves forward.
- It begins from what is given.
- Definitions and known facts justify each step.
- Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.
Answer: the given information and definitions
3. Practice case C (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): To disprove "All multiples of 4 are multiples of 8," which counterexample works?
Choices: 4 · 8 · 16 · 24
Show solution
- Warm-up: First identify exactly what the question is asking: Practice case C (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): To disprove "All multiples of 4 are multiples of 8," which counterexample works?
- Compare each answer choice with the calculation or rule, and eliminate choices that do not satisfy the condition.
- A counterexample must be a multiple of 4.
- 4 is not a multiple of 8.
- So 4 disproves the claim.
- Verify the selected choice by checking that it satisfies the original prompt and that the other choices fail the same test.
Answer: 4
4. Practice case D (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): Reasoning by cases is appropriate when:
Choices: the cases cover all possibilities · only one example is checked · the conclusion is ignored · the domain is unknown
Show solution
- Casework splits a problem into possibilities.
- The proof is complete only if every possibility is covered.
- Then each case can be handled separately.
Answer: the cases cover all possibilities
5. Practice case E (Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete): In a contradiction argument, you begin by:
Choices: assuming the opposite of what you want to prove · assuming the conclusion is already true · checking only easy numbers · deleting the hypothesis
Show solution
- Contradiction starts with the opposite assumption.
- If that assumption leads to an impossibility, it cannot hold.
- Then the original claim is supported.
Answer: assuming the opposite of what you want to prove
Practice this interactively with instant feedback and an AI tutor.
Practice Checking Whether an Explanation Is Complete Take the free placement check