CMClearMathAcademy

Finding Counterexamples

A free Logic lesson from the “Counterexamples, Sets, and Diagrams” unit, with a worked example and practice problems including step-by-step solutions.

To disprove a universal implication, choose an object inside the stated domain that satisfies its hypothesis but violates its conclusion. A failed example outside the domain is irrelevant. Many successful examples suggest a claim but do not prove it for an unlimited domain.

What you'll learn

Why it matters: Set diagrams help organize categories in math, science, data analysis, and classification tasks.

Worked example

Problem. Which integer disproves “Every multiple of 25 is a multiple of 50”?

  1. 25 satisfies the hypothesis but is not divisible by 50.

Answer: 25

Lesson preview: this page shows 5 practice items. The interactive activity contains 6 practice items and 6 quiz items (multiple choice). Counts include repeated prompts and variants.

Practice problems

1. Which integer disproves “Every multiple of 10 is a multiple of 20”?

Choices: 20 · 40 · 60 · 10

Show solution
  1. 10 satisfies the hypothesis but is not divisible by 20.

Answer: 10

2. Which value disproves “Every odd positive integer is prime”?

Choices: 5 · 7 · 9 · 3

Show solution
  1. 9 is odd, positive and composite because 9=3×3.

Answer: 9

3. Which real x disproves x²=x for every real x?

Choices: Both 0 and 1 · 10 · 0 · 1

Show solution
  1. 10²=100, which is not 10.
  2. Both 0 and 1 actually satisfy the equation.

Answer: 10

4. A claim concerns all integers greater than 10. A proposed counterexample is 8. Why is it invalid?

Choices: It does not satisfy the hypothesis · A counterexample must be prime · A counterexample must prove the conclusion · One example can never disprove a universal claim

Show solution
  1. A counterexample must belong to the stated domain and satisfy the setup.

Answer: It does not satisfy the hypothesis

5. A student checks 100 squares and observes four equal sides. Does this alone prove every square has four equal sides?

Choices: Yes; 100 examples always prove a theorem · No; squares do not have equal sides · Yes; a diagram proves every case · No; use the definition to establish the universal claim

Show solution
  1. Finite examples do not by themselves prove an unbounded universal claim.
  2. The definition supplies the general justification here.

Answer: No; use the definition to establish the universal claim

Practice this interactively with instant feedback and an AI tutor.

Practice Finding Counterexamples Take the free placement check

More Logic lessons