CMClearMathAcademy

What a Counterexample Does

A free Logic lesson from the “Counterexamples, Sets, and Diagrams” unit, with a worked example and practice problems including step-by-step solutions.

To disprove a universal implication, choose an object inside the stated domain that satisfies its hypothesis but violates its conclusion. A failed example outside the domain is irrelevant. Many successful examples suggest a claim but do not prove it for an unlimited domain.

What you'll learn

Why it matters: Set diagrams help organize categories in math, science, data analysis, and classification tasks.

Worked example

Problem. Which integer disproves “Every multiple of 22 is a multiple of 44”?

  1. 22 satisfies the hypothesis but is not divisible by 44.

Answer: 22

Lesson preview: this page shows 5 practice items. The interactive activity contains 6 practice items and 6 quiz items (multiple choice). Counts include repeated prompts and variants.

Practice problems

1. Which integer disproves “Every multiple of 7 is a multiple of 14”?

Choices: 28 · 42 · 7 · 14

Show solution
  1. 7 satisfies the hypothesis but is not divisible by 14.

Answer: 7

2. Which value disproves “Every odd positive integer is prime”?

Choices: 7 · 9 · 3 · 5

Show solution
  1. 9 is odd, positive and composite because 9=3×3.

Answer: 9

3. Which real x disproves x²=x for every real x?

Choices: 7 · 0 · 1 · Both 0 and 1

Show solution
  1. 7²=49, which is not 7.
  2. Both 0 and 1 actually satisfy the equation.

Answer: 7

4. A claim concerns all integers greater than 10. A proposed counterexample is 8. Why is it invalid?

Choices: A counterexample must be prime · A counterexample must prove the conclusion · One example can never disprove a universal claim · It does not satisfy the hypothesis

Show solution
  1. A counterexample must belong to the stated domain and satisfy the setup.

Answer: It does not satisfy the hypothesis

5. A student checks 100 squares and observes four equal sides. Does this alone prove every square has four equal sides?

Choices: No; squares do not have equal sides · Yes; a diagram proves every case · No; use the definition to establish the universal claim · Yes; 100 examples always prove a theorem

Show solution
  1. Finite examples do not by themselves prove an unbounded universal claim.
  2. The definition supplies the general justification here.

Answer: No; use the definition to establish the universal claim

Practice this interactively with instant feedback and an AI tutor.

Practice What a Counterexample Does Take the free placement check

More Logic lessons